[PDF]
http://dx.doi.org/10.3952/lithjphys.52204
Open access article / Atviros prieigos straipsnis
Lith. J. Phys. 52, 102–114 (2012)
WEAKLY
INEFFICIENT
MARKETS: STABILITY OF HIGH-FREQUENCY TRADING STRATEGIES
S. Esipov
Quant Isle LTD., Scarsdale, New
York, USA
E-mail: sergei.esipov@gmail.com
Received 5 March 2012; accepted 7 June 2012
Market participants who capitalize
on high-frequency price dynamics and rely on automated trading are
responsible, along with market makers, for the observed level of
market efficiency. The remaining inefficiency is usually measured as the ratio of
expected P&L, derived from the price signals, to its standard
deviation. Such signals are also termed alpha in market slang. Signals and their
volatility depend on time in a different manner, leading to
temporal diversification and rise of multi-step strategies. It is
shown that the coexistence of small market inefficiencies,
multi-step strategies, and market impact lead to price
randomization. In other words, high-frequency strategies redefine
prices in their attempt to amplify weak price signals, and make
markets more effective. In this paper we identify and explore
discrete and continuous strategies. We further demonstrate that
strategies within the domain of weak inefficiency are stable when
incorporated into regular risk-return framework. In the presence
of market impact we show how an efficiency edge propagates towards
smaller time scales.
Keywords: econophysics,
financial markets
PACS: 89.65.Gh
References / Nuorodos
[1] E. Fama, The behavior of stock market prices, The Journal of
Business 38, 34–105 (1965),
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2350752,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/294743
[2] P. Samuelson, Proof that properly anticipated prices fluctuate
randomly, Industrial Management Review 6, 41–49 (1965)
[3] E. Fama, Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and
empirical work, Journal of Finance 25(2),
383–417
(1970),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1970.tb00518.x
[4] A.W. Lo, Hedge Funds: an
Analytic Perspective (Princeton University Press, Princeton
and Oxford, 2008)
[5] On its web site Thomson Reuters advertises a set of data and
tools to help their clients in developing and deploying strategies
for generating alpha and controlling risk (Thomson Reuters, 2010),
http://thomsonreuters.com/products_services/financial/financial_products/quantitave_research_trading
[6] J. Keehner, Milliseconds are focus in algorithmic trades (2007),
http://www.reuters.com/article/ExchangesandTrading07/idUSN1046529820070511
[7] T. Yamamoto and Y. Ikebe, Inversion of band matrices, Linear
Algebra and its Applications 24,
105–111 (1979),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0024-3795(79)90151-4
[8] G. Meurant, A review on the inverse of symmetric tridiagonal and
block tridiagonal matrices, SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and
Applications 13(3), 707–728
(1992),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/0613045
[9] S. Esipov and I. Vaysburd, On the profit and loss distribution
of dynamic hedging strategies, International Journal of Theoretical
and Applied Finance 2,
131–153 (1999),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219024999000108
[10] S. Esipov and I. Vaysburd, Dynamic investment strategies:
Portfolio insurance versus efficient frontier, available at SSRN
(1999),
http://ssrn.com/abstract=170574
or
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.170574
[11] A. Kyle, Continuous auctions and insider trading, Econometrica
53(6), 1315–1335 (1985),
http://www.jstor.org/stable/1913210,
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1913210
[12] R. Almgren and N. Chriss, Optimal execution of portfolio
transactions, Journal of Risk 3,
5–39 (Winter 2000/2001)
[13] R. Almgren, Optimal execution with nonlinear impact functions
and trading-enhanced risk, Applied Mathematical Finance 10, 1–18 (2003),
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/135048602100056